• Home
  • About Us
    • Overview
      • Section1
        16 years of experience in helping the world find data-driven solutions.
    • Who we are
      • About Us
      • Our Team
      • Careers
      • Survey Point
    • What we do
      • Our Projects
      • Publications
      • Practice Areas
      • Blog
      • Resources
      • Contacts
    • Media
      • News
      • Events
      • Gallery
  • Our Projects
  • Our Team
  • Careers
  • Sambodhi Panels
  • Capacity Building
Site Logo

Resources

Popular Search thematic

Frameworks

  • OECD DAC Criteria
  • Human Rights and Gender
  • CCPC Framework

Process

  • Logframe Approach

Designs

  • Regression Discontinuity
  • Pre-Post Test Design
  • Randomised Control Trials
  • Difference in Difference

Methods

  • Structured Surveys
  • Focus Group Discussions

Approaches

  • Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)
  • RAPID Outcome Assessment
  • Value for Money Evaluation
  • SROI
  • Process Evaluation
  • Outcome Mapping
  • Outcome Evaluation
  • Network Evaluation
  • Needs Analysis
  • Most Significant Change
  • Formative Evaluation
  • Ex-Ante Evaluation
  • Ex-Post Evaluations
  • Survey templates

Equity and Poverty Alleviation

  • Life Table: Overview, Types, and Application
  • Measuring Health Inequity : Concentration Index and Curve
  • Measuring Inequality: Lorentz Curve and Ginni Index

Tests

  • Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) : Overview, Type, and Application
  • Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA): Overview and Application
  • Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA): Overview, Type, and Application
  • Home
  • Resources
  • Approaches
  • Outcome Mapping

Outcome Mapping

Table of Contents
  • Outcome Mapping
    • OM has three stages (Serrat, 2008):
    • Keywords:
    • List of recommended resources:
      • For a broad overview
      • Webinars
        • For in depth understanding
        • Case Study
    • FAQs

Outcome Mapping #

“…being attentive along the journey is as important as, and critical to, arriving at a destination Michael Quinn Paton in Earl et al., n.d. on the significance of outcome mapping for program evaluation.”

Image Source: Geske, J. “Starting with Outcome Mapping (episode 2). Amazing Outcomes. Medium. 11 November 2019

“A research team in Kenya is seeking to improve crop yields by identifying appropriate and ecologically sound agronomic practices for use on small family farms. Practitioners seek to identify changes in farmer behaviour – before, during and after the project. Therefore, they need to collect data on farmer behaviour to assess progress, to identify ways to improve project performance and to report on the results achieved (see Smutylo, 2001 for more details).”

In such scenario, Outcome Mapping can be an effective tool to achieve desired objectives.

International Development can be highly complex, and changes can be multi-directional, often occurring before or after a program ends. Often outcomes in projects interact and influence one another, and causal factors cannot be isolated. This makes it difficult to attribute changes to specific program components, or even draw comparisons across different initiatives.

Developed by the International Development Research Centre (IDRC), Outcome mapping (OM) is a still evolving methodology for planning, monitoring and evaluating development initiatives that aim to bring about social change. It is based on the premise, that for “each change in state there are correlating changes in behavior that are best encouraged if continuing responsibility has been devolved to local people and local institutions” (Serrat, 2008).

In OM, Development results or outcomes are viewed in terms of changes in behaviour, actions or relationships influenced by the team or the program. The performance of the program is defined as the program’s contribution to influencing those changes. This is why, OM is considered most useful in program contexts where the success of the program depends on key behavioural changes, and it is here its key innovation lies.

The process of OM helps specify the actors the program seeks to target, the changes it expects to see and the strategies it employs – helping improve program efficiency (Smutylo, 2005)

                                   

           Three stages of outcome mapping.Taken from Sumtylo et al,2001,p.4

OM has three stages (Serrat, 2008): #

Intentional Design: A planning stage where practitioners reach a consensus on broad changes it would like to achieve, and plan the strategies to be used accordingly.

Outcome and Performance Monitoring: A stage providing the framework to track the progress made towards outcomes. It builds on progress markers, strategy maps and organizational practices made during the intentional design stage using information collection tools – an outcome, strategy and performance journal – to create the necessary work-space and processes for adequate reflection on performance improvement.

Evaluation Planning: A stage outlining the main evaluation elements and prioritising them to target evaluation resources and activities to ensure they are most beneficial.

Keywords: #

Outcome Mapping, Evaluation, International Development, Programs, Planning, Monitoring, Social Change, Outcomes, Behavior Change, Learning, M&E, Development Programs, Research.

List of recommended resources: #

For a broad overview #

Outcome Mapping by Olivier Serrat

Published by Asian Development Bank, this five-pager provides the rationale for outcome mapping, defines outcome mapping terms and explains the various stages involved in it.

Outcome Mapping: A Method for Tracking Behavioural Changes In Development Programs

Written by Terry Smutylo, this four page brief is a succinct and illustrative guide to Outcome Mapping, describing its the three stages, and highlights its utility in expressing results as behavioural changes through case studies in agro-industry projects.

Outcome Mapping Practitioner Guide

Published by Outcome Mapping Learning Community, this website provides a practitioner’s guide to OM. It explains: What is OM and how has it evolved?, Preparing to use OM, The three stages of OM, Using OM with other PM&E tools and approaches, facilitating OM workshops and its use in specific program and contexts. You can view this this webinar by the OM community on how to use this online guide, and what you can find there.

Webinars #

An Introduction to Outcome Mapping for M&E and Learning

Published by Caribbean Evaluators International, this webinar explains outcome mapping using a simple and effective presentation.

For in depth understanding #
Outcome Mapping – Building Learning and Reflection into Development Programs

Written by Earl, Carden and Smutylo; this book discusses outcome mapping theory and approaches in detail. It describes the stages, steps and methods in implementing OM and provides practitioners with a sample intentional design framework.

Case Study #
Using Elements of Outcome Mapping in the ‘Resilient Adolescents in the Syria Crisis’ Programme

Developed by Save the Children, this resource highlights how outcome mapping was used to support adolescents in Syria and help them become more resilient.

Research for Change Outcome Mapping’s Contribution to Emancipatory Action Research in Africa

Written by Ineke Buskens, this resource highlights how outcome mapping can complement Emancipatory Action Research approaches, through its application in the Infant Feeding Research Project, which aims to reduce the paediatric HIV/AIDS rate in southern Africa by enhancing the effectiveness of infant feeding counselling.

Using outcome mapping as a monitoring and management tool in a small ruminant value chain project

Developed by Hailemichael Taye, Kees Swaans and Saskia Hendrickx, this case study shares the experiences of using outcome mapping (OM) in Goat Value Chain Development Projects in India and Mozambique.

.

FAQs #

Outcome Mapping FAQs

Produced by IDRC’s Evaluation Unit, these FAQS guides practitioners in determining the utility of outcome mapping in their contexts

What are your Feelings
Share This Article :
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
Still stuck? How can we help?

How can we help?

Process EvaluationOutcome Evaluation
Table of Contents
  • Outcome Mapping
    • OM has three stages (Serrat, 2008):
    • Keywords:
    • List of recommended resources:
      • For a broad overview
      • Webinars
        • For in depth understanding
        • Case Study
    • FAQs

South Asia

C - 126, Sector 2, Noida - 201301, Uttar Pradesh
+91 120 4056400-99, +91 120 4127069
bd@sambodhi.co.in

South-East Asia

#132C, Street 135, Sangkat Psar Doeum Thkov, Khan Chamkarmorn Phnom Penh
+855 81738017
bd@sambodhi.co.in

Sub-Saharan Africa

Sambodhi Ltd 1 Floor, Acacia Estates Building, Kinondoni Road Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania
+255 787894173
bd@sambodhi.co.in
Copyright © 2023 Sambodhi Research and Communications Pvt Ltd. All rights reserved.